So I saw something last week about the Palm Pre, which is a new Palm device running a new Palm proprietary OS called webOS. I found out today that it's a Linux-based OS, and the APIs are some sort of Javascript runtime that uses CSS for the UI development. It sounds a lot like what Apple tried (and failed) to do with the iPhone before releasing a real API.
My immediate thought was, who cares enough to develop for this? Right now in the smartphone market, you have several big players: Apple (iPhone), RIM (Blackberry), Google (Android), and Nokia (Symbian). Of those, Apple has the "it" factor, Google has geek buzz and a nice Java API, RIM has business mindshare and Nokia has massive marketshare.
If you agree that right now, developers are the key to the success of your smartphone platform, what would allow Palm to compete for developers? Who would want to develop for the Palm platform over the Android platform? Nokia sells more phones than anyone, and I have a lot of concern over the long term viability of Symbian because developing for it sucks. I don't have any insider knowledge at all, but I do know that there is a Linux-based OS called maemo that Nokia works on, so that may be their answer to that problem.
But Palm, why? Palm has a history of being awful to code for, and I don't see anything about this platform that's more compelling than any of the others I mentioned. Who cares?





The last question is the remote. John is leaning toward something like a 


